Conservatives Praise Dinesh D’Souza’s ‘Death of a Nation’ as a ‘Must See’

Dinesh DeSouza is popular amont conservatives because his "documentaries" (which are, indeed, plain simple propaganda) just "prove" them that they are right.

Dinesh DeSouza is the american version of Joseph Goebbels.
 
Dinesh DeSouza is popular amont conservatives because his "documentaries" (which are, indeed, plain simple propaganda) just "prove" them that they are right.

Dinesh DeSouza is the american version of Joseph Goebbels.

No, he isn't Goebbels, he describes liberals and obama muppets as who they really are as well the danger that leftists and their retarded views are causing to America. And Michael "the Fat Pig" Moore and all the mainstream media who were and still are all Obama's submissive litlle bitches are a disgrace to America. When you had people like Mueller, Comey , Brennan, Lynch, Jackson, Lynch, Holder, Kamala Harris, Maxine Waters and other liberal douchebags, your party can't be credible.
 

Attachments

  • obama34.jpg
    obama34.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 81
Müeller = lifelong Republican, James director of the FBI by Georges W. Bush

Comey : so pro-Hillary, so Liberal that, days before the election he announced the re-opening of the investigations on Hillary
 
Müeller = lifelong Republican, James director of the FBI by Georges W. Bush

Comey : so pro-Hillary, so Liberal that, days before the election he announced the re-opening of the investigations on Hillary

Another thing about American politics that you don’t seem to understand. Sometimes Democrats register as Republicans to get elected in red districts or states then govern as Democrats. Some people register as Republicans for political expediency and to infiltrate and dilute the pivot toward conservatism. Comey explained his reasoning for reopening the investigation and it wasn’t to hurt Hillary. Even his wife and daughters supported her. And yes, Dinesh is just like Goebbels, except that he tells the truth.

I plan on seeing the movie this week.
 
Dinesh DeSouza is popular amont conservatives because his "documentaries" (which are, indeed, plain simple propaganda) just "prove" them that they are right.

Dinesh DeSouza is the american version of Joseph Goebbels.

The guy is nothing more than an opportunist preying on the dumb cuntery of the modern right.

And there's certainly no lack of that. Cha ching $$$

One elemental fact utterly destroys his whole premise: the historical democrats he demonizes were all hard right conservatives.

But in this day and age of mangled reality and alternate facts that doesn't really seem to matter. Mindless, knowledge-impaired conservibots will flock to his "extravagnza" despite the fact what it actually highlights is how horrid the heritage of conservatism has been in america.
 
The guy is nothing more than an opportunist preying on the dumb cuntery of the modern right.

One elemental fact utterly destroys his whole premise: the historical democrats he demonizes were all hard right conservatives.

But in this day and age of mangled reality and alternate facts that doesn't really seem to matter. Mindless, knowledge-impaired conservibots will flock to his "movie" despite the fact what it actually highlights is how horrid the heritage of conservatism has been in america.
Worse with Michael "the fat pig " Moore who was making dumbfuckeries such as Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore in Trumpland, Where to invade next, Capitalism a love story, Sicko, Farenheit who showed his leftism, lack of patriotism and utter moronism. Remember who founded the KKK? Democrats. People like Clintons and Obamas were hardly patriots or respectable people, for you they are probably but not for an overwhelming majority of people.8 years of Obama have been shit and giggles at its worst levels and socialism is the distribution of misery.
 

Attachments

  • jpeg-640x350.jpg
    jpeg-640x350.jpg
    51.8 KB · Views: 77
  • obama8.jpg
    obama8.jpg
    79.6 KB · Views: 74
The guy is nothing more than an opportunist preying on the dumb cuntery of the modern right.

And there's certainly no lack of that. Cha ching $$$

One elemental fact utterly destroys his whole premise: the historical democrats he demonizes were all hard right conservatives.

But in this day and age of mangled reality and alternate facts that doesn't really seem to matter. Mindless, knowledge-impaired conservibots will flock to his "extravagnza" despite the fact what it actually highlights is how horrid the heritage of conservatism has been in america.

Did these Democrats proclaim there loyalty to racist conservatism? How many Dixiecrats switched to the Republican Party?

Are the peddlers of leftwing propaganda “ opportunists” also? Or are they simply providing a service to the consumers of their message?

I like moments like these because the rabid leftwinger in you pops out from under the mask of perceived reason where you proceed to hand out some of the most insulting attacks on conservative thought. Was Dinesh an “ opportunist” for daring to tell the truth about a sitting president only to find himself sitting in jail thanks to a political prosecution? The very same laws that Rosie O’Donnell has broken yet remains free? The Democrat party has an embarrassing ugly past that cannot be ignored as much as you’d like to, and one simple fact that only ONE Democrat left the party even after the so called big switch destroys your argument. Reap it.
 
Remember who founded the KKK? Democrats.

Yeah, Georges. Southern democrats. Who were all hard core conservatives.

Maybe brush up on american history before walking out on that unsupportable plank again.
 
Remember who founded the KKK? Democrats.

Yeah, Georges. Southern democrats. Who were all hard core conservatives.

Maybe brush up on american history before walking out on that unsupportable plank again.

Link to where they gathered, announced and forwarded what is a conservative agenda by modern standards? Keep going because you need to research the platform of 19th century Democrats before I systematically dismantle you.
 
Are the peddlers of leftwing propaganda “ opportunists” also?

Yeah some of them are.

I like moments like these because the rabid leftwinger in you pops out from under the mask of perceived reason

LOL Uh huh. Relating historical fact is being a rabid leftwinger :rolleyes:
I like moments like this where your ad hominum attacks miss the mark by a mile.

I understand you don't like it. I understand why you might try to turn absurd somersaults to disown it. It's a fucking UGLY heritage.
But the fact remains ALL of those folks were CONSERVATIVES. Not liberals. So I'm sorry, but if there's any shame to be felt it's yours, not mine.
 
Remember who founded the KKK? Democrats.

Yeah, Georges. Southern democrats. Who were all hard core conservatives.

Maybe brush up on american history before walking out on that unsupportable plank again.

Maybe you should revise your history before claiming you know it better than me and please gets your facts straight .
Debunking the claim that "The KKK was founded as the military arm of the Democratic Party."
https://www.politifact.com/wisconsi...ing-claim-kkk-was-founded-military-arm-democ/

Dinesh D'Souza: The secret history of the Democratic Party
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/22/dinesh-dsouza-secret-history-democratic-party.html
 
Are the peddlers of leftwing propaganda “ opportunists” also?

Yeah some of them are.

I like moments like these because the rabid leftwinger in you pops out from under the mask of perceived reason

LOL Uh huh. Relating historical fact is being a rabid leftwinger :rolleyes:
I like moments like this where your ad hominum attacks miss the mark by a mile.

I understand you don't like it. I understand why you might try to turn absurd somersaults to disown it. It's a fucking UGLY heritage.
But the fact remains ALL of those folks were CONSERVATIVES. Not liberals. So I'm sorry, but if there's any shame to be felt it's yours, not mine.

I am a member of the Republican Party remember? I don’t have to accept blame for your party or its long embarrassing history. It isn’t even 30 years ago that Bill Clinton was praising William Fulbright and Robert C.Byrd? I don’t blame YOU for trying to distance yourself from the racist past but it exists. I’d say Dinesh has done a wonderful job of telling the story and triggering liberals all at once. That’s a job well done.
 
Well gee instead of "dismantling" me you're just affirming what I've said.

From your first link: Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders.

Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal – the reestablishment of white supremacy – fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s.


I wonder which social philosophy white supremacy might be associated with? Conservatism or liberalism? Hmmm. Wow this is a really tough one...

:1orglaugh
 
Well gee instead of "dismantling" me you're just affirming what I've said.

From your first link: Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders.

Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal – the reestablishment of white supremacy – fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s.


I wonder which social philosophy white supremacy might be associated with? Conservatism or liberalism? Hmmm. Wow this is a really tough one...

:1orglaugh
1) I didn’t post any links
2) I haven’t started to dismantle you yet because you seem to be doing a bang up job on your own.
3) besides it just being what you want to believe, what in 19th century Democrat party philosophy in any way parallels modern conservatism?
 
Last edited:
Top