• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Chrysler repays $7.6 Billion in Bailout Money

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Things are moving in the right direction at long last for all of the Big 3 US automakers. First Ford, then GM and now Chrysler. Definitely a good sign for the economy.

Chrysler repays $7.6 billion U.S., Canada loans

STERLING HEIGHTS, Michigan (Reuters) – Chrysler Group LLC on Tuesday paid back $7.6 billion in U.S. and Canadian government loans from its 2009 bailout, a move that allows the U.S. automaker to distance itself from an unpopular bailout and deepen its ties with Italian automaker Fiat SpA.

At a suburban Detroit assembly plant where Chrysler builds the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger cars, hundreds of Chrysler workers marked the event by sporting red, white and blue buttons that read: "Paid. May 24, 2011."

Sergio Marchionne, the chief executive of both Chrysler and Fiat, told the crowd: "We received confirmation this morning at 10:13 a.m. from Citigroup that Chrysler Group repaid, with interest ... every penny that had been loaned less than two years ago.

"We are changing both the image and substance of our group and are regaining the faith of the public at large," he added.

Chrysler said it transferred $5.9 billion to the U.S. Treasury and $1.7 billion to the governments of Canada and Ontario to repay loans it received in June 2009.

In London on Tuesday, President Barack Obama called the payback a "significant milestone" and a sign the U.S. auto industry was recovering.

The repayment puts Chrysler on firmer financial ground and draws it closer to Fiat, two goals that investors and bankers have said would make Chrysler more attractive in an initial public offering that could come this year or next.

The automaker said it repaid the original loans in full, more than six years ahead of schedule. Under the original terms, Chrysler had until 2017 to repay the debt.

To repay the loans, Chrysler swapped out government debt with cheaper debt from institutional investors. The move does not leave the company with any less debt on its books, but Chrysler said the refinancing would save it an estimated $350 million a year in interest expenses.

The automaker paid more than $1.2 billion in interest on its debts in 2010. Marchionne's frustration with the terms of the government loans seemed to bubble over earlier this year when he denounced them as "shyster loans.

Chrysler has not completely ended its government involvement.

The U.S. Treasury still holds a 6.6 percent common equity stake in Chrysler that Ron Bloom, the Obama administration's point man for auto restructuring, said the government wants to dispose of "as soon as practical." He also said the government did not expect to fully recover its remaining outstanding investment of $1.9 billion in the automaker.

Bloom said Chrysler's early payoff qualified it for "comeback of the year" and was also a feather in Obama's cap as he gears up for the 2012 presidential race.

"The intervention of the guy who sits in the Oval Office made a difference to a million lives two years ago, and I don't think it's unreasonable to remind people," he said of the U.S. government's bailout of Chrysler.

The Canadian government still owns a 1.7 percent stake.

WALL STREET'S FAITH

Chrysler's ability to pull off a deal at all is a sign of Wall Street's renewed faith in the company, which was nearly left for dead two years ago at the height of the financial crisis.

"When we did this deal back in 2009, we couldn't have borrowed a buck from a 7-Eleven store -- the banking system was shut," Marchionne said earlier this year.

A sharp drop in auto sales pushed the Auburn Hills, Michigan-based company to the brink of collapse in 2009 before its federal bailout.

U.S. Treasury officials were initially divided on saving the company, but ultimately decided to prop it up to preserve jobs. Chrysler emerged from bankruptcy nearly two years ago under Fiat's management.

Marchionne was a central figure in laying the groundwork for the Chrysler deal in 2009. He refused to have Fiat put up any cash for Chrysler.

Instead, the U.S. Treasury devised a series of tests that allowed Fiat to raise its stake. Over time, Fiat can increase its stake to 76 percent, according to a recent regulatory filing.

Marchionne reiterated that before Chrysler makes an IPO, discussions need to take place with the healthcare trust affiliated with the United Auto Workers union, which wants to cash out of its 45.7 percent stake in Chrysler.

Chrysler, along with General Motors Co and Ford Motor Co, will negotiate new labor deals with the UAW this summer.

General Holiefield, the UAW vice president in charge of the union's Chrysler department, declined to discuss whether concessions will be necessary to allow the U.S. automakers to better compete with new rivals like Volkswagen AG, which on Tuesday officially opened a plant in Tennessee staffed by less-expensive nonunion workers.

"It's a day we've long been looking forward to," he said of the Chrysler loan repayments. He said later that he was not concerned about the lower-cost VW plant.

As a result of the loan repayments, Fiat's stake in Chrysler has risen to 46 percent, making Fiat the largest single shareholder and putting it within striking distance of its 51 percent goal in 2011. Once Chrysler develops a vehicle that gets 40 miles per gallon on a Fiat platform -- a development Marchionne said Chrysler will meet in the fourth quarter -- Fiat can go to 51 percent.

FIAT-CHRYSLER INTEGRATION

Marchionne can also bolster Fiat's earnings by moving quickly to integrate its operations with Chrysler's, analysts said. He reiterated that Chrysler will show a net profit for the year.

Marchionne, who received standing ovations from plant workers, said the companies are moving quickly to accelerate the pace of integration. Chrysler's financial results, while still reported separately, will be consolidated with Fiat's starting June 1. He also said the companies need to look at a more intertwined management structure.

"There's no question about integrating parts and strategies, basic technologies," he said.

Reference is here:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110524/bs_nm/us_chrysler
 

StanScratch

My Penis Is Dancing!
Chrysler started moving in the right direction once Bob Nardelli parted ways.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Now Chrysler may start to make decent cars?

Dude....out of all the recent "retro" muscle-car wannabes, in my mind, the 2011 Dodge Challenger is a work of art.

dodge-challenger-2011.jpg


That said, I'd agree with you on a lot of their other recent offerings. Although it isn't exactly immediate history either but my 2001 Chrysler 300M is an awesome car. 190K miles and still going strong....rides like a dream. The best product of the Daimler/Chrysler era. I've always been a big Chrysler aficionado and I would love a resurrection of the species. :thumbsup:
 
Chrysler, while making gains, is not moving in the right direction. They continue to make big, heavy, inefficient cars. Chrysler will be dead within 5 years if they don't change their tactics.

Look at Ford and GM - lots of high fuel efficiency models. Ford is currently beating Honda and Toyota with overall fuel efficiency in their sedans. Chrysler continues to make cars that get 18 MPG.

Fuck Chrysler. They are, in my opinion, ready to just pack up shop.
 
Dude....out of all the recent "retro" muscle-car wannabes, in my mind, the 2011 Dodge Challenger is a work of art.

http://www.technology-updates.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/dodge-challenger-2011.jpg
Yes, if you are an Cuban-born gang boss in Miami, may be extremely beautiful and perfect for all needs.
Surely in Europe will be sold as luxury car, when probably even a standard Volkswagen has more accesories. Damned promotional policies.

That said, I'd agree with you on a lot of their other recent offerings. Although it isn't exactly immediate history either but my 2001 Chrysler 300M is an awesome car. 190K miles and still going strong....rides like a dream. The best product of the Daimler/Chrysler era. I've always been a big Chrysler aficionado and I would love a resurrection of the species. :thumbsup:
Never drove the 300M, but I hope that's a lot different from the 300C.
Times ago I've seen the hearse version of 300C, I wonder where is the space for the coffin, since inside the normal 300C the internal space is quite small.
 
Chrysler, while making gains, is not moving in the right direction. They continue to make big, heavy, inefficient cars. Chrysler will be dead within 5 years if they don't change their tactics.

Look at Ford and GM - lots of high fuel efficiency models. Ford is currently beating Honda and Toyota with overall fuel efficiency in their sedans. Chrysler continues to make cars that get 18 MPG.

Fuck Chrysler. They are, in my opinion, ready to just pack up shop.
Don't worry. Soon should arrive new Lancia cars, marked as Chrysler. Also Fiat engines aren't so bad, although there isn't a wide option as power. Ford and especially GM should say thank to their European branches...

I'm angry with them because they had completely ruined Lancia, when they adopted this new stylistics taken from Chrysler. They are 20-30 years that Lancia assembles hideous cars, but at least they were "original".
 
Don't worry. Soon should arrive new Lancia cars, marked as Chrysler. Also Fiat engines aren't so bad, although there isn't a wide option as power. Ford and especially GM should say thank to their European branches...

I'm angry with them because they had completely ruined Lancia, when they adopted this new stylistics taken from Chrysler. They are 20-30 years that Lancia assembles hideous cars, but at least they were "original".

A fair point.

But I still think that Chrysler is going to essentially disappear in the next 5 years. Fiat is going to become a common brand in North America, and good for them.
 

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
Chrysler, while making gains, is not moving in the right direction. They continue to make big, heavy, inefficient cars. Chrysler will be dead within 5 years if they don't change their tactics.

Fuck Chrysler. They are, in my opinion, ready to just pack up shop.

Lee Iacocca called.

He said, "Fuck you."
 
A fair point.

But I still think that Chrysler is going to essentially disappear in the next 5 years. Fiat is going to become a common brand in North America, and good for them.
Well... In my opinion, one of the cause of GM financial troubles was the the brand range too wide, with the same cars. I don't remember each one (also because many of them were non-existent in the European market) but surely they were too numerous.

Fiat is already a large brand in South America, and they have desperate needs to expand towards new markets, like North America. Now Fiat assembles mainly compact cars and small sedans and this doesn't overlaps with the Chrysler (or Dodge, or Jeep) vehicle range. So, in my opinion Chrysler's time hasn't come yet. At least not in North America.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
now if they would only pay me back for the money I spent on that eagle premier back in 93 plus all the repairs it needed.
300 dollars for a radiator hose, wtf is that?
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Yes, if you are an Cuban-born gang boss in Miami, may be extremely beautiful and perfect for all needs.
Surely in Europe will be sold as luxury car, when probably even a standard Volkswagen has more accesories. Damned promotional policies.

:wtf: are you talking about? I guess you really had to be there in the late '60s when it was the heyday of the muscle car to appreciate the effort here. I assume you weren't? :dunno: I know....I'm a dying breed. :crying:

Never drove the 300M, but I hope that's a lot different from the 300C.
Times ago I've seen the hearse version of 300C, I wonder where is the space for the coffin, since inside the normal 300C the internal space is quite small.

No comparison between the two cars. I despise the 300C. Terrible sight lines, rides like a truck and is perhaps the most uncomfortable car ever built.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
:wtf: are you talking about? I guess you really had to be there in the late '60s when it was the heyday of the muscle car to appreciate the effort here. I assume you weren't? :dunno: I know....I'm a dying breed. :crying:



No comparison between the two cars. I despise the 300C. Terrible sight lines, rides like a truck and is perhaps the most uncomfortable car ever built.

I think that the current Challenger is the best looking of all the new "retro" style cars.
It is a work of art.

Dodge-2011-Challenger-SRT8-392-3.jpg
 
It's nice they repaid the loan but I'll still never buy one of their cars again after the way they fucked me over on a lease a few years back.

:cool:
 
Top