BI-FEM SEX APPEAL – a new erotic genre
http://board.freeones.com/images/freeones/smilies/boobies.gif
Male-female screen sex is getting bland. It is now on TV, in mainstream movies, as well as freely on the web. The porn-paying public's appetite will inevitably be in search of something more high-octane.
Meanwhile, as if stuck in a rut, a vast swathe of US output seems narrowly organised around fixed categories of scenes/movies - oral/bj, anal, unadventurous ffm, GB, busty & large BBW. And tuck in a reservation on its own, some very dull so-called ‘lesbian.’
Realistic bi-female action that could electrify a range of movie scenes as a powerful erotic peak is oddly out of reach, as if producers are unsure how to accommodate it. Predictable group scenes include minor lesbian action only as a mere teaser or momentary sideshow, even when it may be the only really erotic moment
The problem is inflexible categories of production dumped lesbian action in one scene/movie and hetero m-f sex in another.
Anyone looking for a spicy blend of both will be looking for a long time.
But that’s what we are given by an oddly conservative industry management
Adult forum comments indicate a market for variety is there; but the films are not.
Instead, uniformity is killing the erotic spark.
THE MISSING PIECE
The missing erotic ingredient is a scenario casting and showing women turned on by both male and female; where women can switch & combine foreplay& sex with either & both; & where strong lesbian action returns amid m-f sex, not ending abruptly as male(s) arrive.
A sexy pornstar stimulated to orgasm with female and male partners in one extended scene may become extremely popular.
Unfortunately, what we mostly get is token tongue touching between females in ffm/ ffmm or group/party scenes. Encouraging more indulgent lesbian action in scenes alongside sex with males should appeal to many. We are talking performers with experience - not the awkward beginner- and smart directors who brief the cast then let them get into it – without interruption.
US performer Michele Raven once said she felt sex scenes purely between women lacked something from an erotic point of view, as ‘there needs to be a cock in there somewhere.’ By implications, the visual intensity was not as provocative in a simple lesbian scene.
An uninhibited female sense of perversion guiding m/f scenes is rare. The options are wide; intense lesbian action in a group scene AFTER male cumshots would be nasty and compelling.
SPICING IT UP
Equally, the now monotonous GB genre would be enlivened by with a gang-bang crew including a couple of female-on-female participants (e.g. strap-on or oral/fingering) alongside the men. (Anabolic once tried this, but only in a half-hearted way).
Female voyeurs watching group action, then taking part, would twist the erotic psychology; as would a female performer, appearing as one of the sound/camera –crew, & who joins in.
There is no reason why female-female seductions may not feature in a large (e.g club or party) scene, spicing up the other male/female action. There are exhibitionist females, hetero and bi, who would excel in this.
We get a stronger bi-female flavour in a few Euro studios movies - e.g. Eromaxx & Harmony among others (Cinema Play/Spice Studios) using Euro performers. The large Eromaxx orgy parties have got closest, but choppy editing makes their scenes diffuse, cutting between participants, losing erotic intensity.
Stronger f-f moments occur in a few Siffredi films, e.g. Animal Trainer 5, with memorable action with Claudia Jamsson, Sylvia Laurent and Michele Wild within the group. His format of three extended mini-movies suits this better - longer segments can accommodate a crescendo of female excitement than is possible in 5 or 6 lukewarm 15-minute gonzo scenes.
But as others have commented, the problem in numerous Siffredi/ Vidal scenes & others by various French directors, is everything revolves around the male climax - the action dies soon after the male cumshot - the women serve his appetite only, rarely their own also.
LOST CLIMAXES
Euro or US, we seldom see female-instigated perversions when all action centres around male actor-directors. Yet for (male) viewers, it is precisely the flush of wild animal excitement on a woman’s face when really aroused that makes porn compelling.
An extraordinary number of French actor-directors (e.g. Le Castel and Clark) have no discernable interest in female climaxes, and cut as soon as males cum. Reviewers have long hinted at how certain ubiquitous male French porn actors seem unaware of what a clitoris is or where to find one. They are not alone…
Similarly, Private’s output often has a tedious male focus– show cumshots then cut - another reason its plastic style is so repetitive.
Recruiting women ex performers as directors could help revive ff/mm and group scenes, revealing facets of a female’s sex-drive, the impulses & provocative surprises missing in tedious copy-cat gonzo.
Giving free rein to womens’ directors’ and performers’ sexual imagination could refresh movie-making and put flagging interest back. More charged female-centred scenes (& arguably fuller feature storylines - another debate) should engage viewers, particularly if uninhibited bi women are not passive performers, but shape the action.
Sadly a series of eye-catching bi-fem performer for whatever reason never got to create a genre of mixed bi-sexual ‘cocktails’. Stunning Euro stars Nella, Eve Angel & Sandra Shine (who all dabbled briefly with m/f scenes) spring to mind.
Hopefully this may make viewers think about what they have been paying for, encourage more creative producers & spark a fission of ideas among women in porn tired of drone directors uneducated in the many ways to arouse a woman.
Thanks for reading.
http://board.freeones.com/images/freeones/smilies/boobies.gif
Male-female screen sex is getting bland. It is now on TV, in mainstream movies, as well as freely on the web. The porn-paying public's appetite will inevitably be in search of something more high-octane.
Meanwhile, as if stuck in a rut, a vast swathe of US output seems narrowly organised around fixed categories of scenes/movies - oral/bj, anal, unadventurous ffm, GB, busty & large BBW. And tuck in a reservation on its own, some very dull so-called ‘lesbian.’
Realistic bi-female action that could electrify a range of movie scenes as a powerful erotic peak is oddly out of reach, as if producers are unsure how to accommodate it. Predictable group scenes include minor lesbian action only as a mere teaser or momentary sideshow, even when it may be the only really erotic moment
The problem is inflexible categories of production dumped lesbian action in one scene/movie and hetero m-f sex in another.
Anyone looking for a spicy blend of both will be looking for a long time.
But that’s what we are given by an oddly conservative industry management
Adult forum comments indicate a market for variety is there; but the films are not.
Instead, uniformity is killing the erotic spark.
THE MISSING PIECE
The missing erotic ingredient is a scenario casting and showing women turned on by both male and female; where women can switch & combine foreplay& sex with either & both; & where strong lesbian action returns amid m-f sex, not ending abruptly as male(s) arrive.
A sexy pornstar stimulated to orgasm with female and male partners in one extended scene may become extremely popular.
Unfortunately, what we mostly get is token tongue touching between females in ffm/ ffmm or group/party scenes. Encouraging more indulgent lesbian action in scenes alongside sex with males should appeal to many. We are talking performers with experience - not the awkward beginner- and smart directors who brief the cast then let them get into it – without interruption.
US performer Michele Raven once said she felt sex scenes purely between women lacked something from an erotic point of view, as ‘there needs to be a cock in there somewhere.’ By implications, the visual intensity was not as provocative in a simple lesbian scene.
An uninhibited female sense of perversion guiding m/f scenes is rare. The options are wide; intense lesbian action in a group scene AFTER male cumshots would be nasty and compelling.
SPICING IT UP
Equally, the now monotonous GB genre would be enlivened by with a gang-bang crew including a couple of female-on-female participants (e.g. strap-on or oral/fingering) alongside the men. (Anabolic once tried this, but only in a half-hearted way).
Female voyeurs watching group action, then taking part, would twist the erotic psychology; as would a female performer, appearing as one of the sound/camera –crew, & who joins in.
There is no reason why female-female seductions may not feature in a large (e.g club or party) scene, spicing up the other male/female action. There are exhibitionist females, hetero and bi, who would excel in this.
We get a stronger bi-female flavour in a few Euro studios movies - e.g. Eromaxx & Harmony among others (Cinema Play/Spice Studios) using Euro performers. The large Eromaxx orgy parties have got closest, but choppy editing makes their scenes diffuse, cutting between participants, losing erotic intensity.
Stronger f-f moments occur in a few Siffredi films, e.g. Animal Trainer 5, with memorable action with Claudia Jamsson, Sylvia Laurent and Michele Wild within the group. His format of three extended mini-movies suits this better - longer segments can accommodate a crescendo of female excitement than is possible in 5 or 6 lukewarm 15-minute gonzo scenes.
But as others have commented, the problem in numerous Siffredi/ Vidal scenes & others by various French directors, is everything revolves around the male climax - the action dies soon after the male cumshot - the women serve his appetite only, rarely their own also.
LOST CLIMAXES
Euro or US, we seldom see female-instigated perversions when all action centres around male actor-directors. Yet for (male) viewers, it is precisely the flush of wild animal excitement on a woman’s face when really aroused that makes porn compelling.
An extraordinary number of French actor-directors (e.g. Le Castel and Clark) have no discernable interest in female climaxes, and cut as soon as males cum. Reviewers have long hinted at how certain ubiquitous male French porn actors seem unaware of what a clitoris is or where to find one. They are not alone…
Similarly, Private’s output often has a tedious male focus– show cumshots then cut - another reason its plastic style is so repetitive.
Recruiting women ex performers as directors could help revive ff/mm and group scenes, revealing facets of a female’s sex-drive, the impulses & provocative surprises missing in tedious copy-cat gonzo.
Giving free rein to womens’ directors’ and performers’ sexual imagination could refresh movie-making and put flagging interest back. More charged female-centred scenes (& arguably fuller feature storylines - another debate) should engage viewers, particularly if uninhibited bi women are not passive performers, but shape the action.
Sadly a series of eye-catching bi-fem performer for whatever reason never got to create a genre of mixed bi-sexual ‘cocktails’. Stunning Euro stars Nella, Eve Angel & Sandra Shine (who all dabbled briefly with m/f scenes) spring to mind.
Hopefully this may make viewers think about what they have been paying for, encourage more creative producers & spark a fission of ideas among women in porn tired of drone directors uneducated in the many ways to arouse a woman.
Thanks for reading.
