I’m not into BDSM, but...OK, I’ll get to the “but” later. I’m not into BDSM because (1) dominatrices (-ixes?) turn me off (and male doms too); (2) I’m not much of a dominant myself, and the part of me that is dominant is a part that scares me and I don’t want to encourage; (3) I could never trust anyone enough to let them tie me up.
OK here’s the “but.”. There is one exception. There is one person (can you guess who?) that I would let tie me up. And it isn’t because I trust her more than anyone else. It’s because she’s a goddess, and I a mere mortal, and as such I have no choice but to submit to her will.
She’s a goddess, but she’s also a submissive. And if she had been a domme, she never would have made it to goddess status in my eyes. I have no desire to be dominated by a dominant, but I desire to be dominated by a submissive – in this case, a particular submissive – but submissive women in general excite a certain awe in me, which under the right circumstances would make me want to submit to them.
That’s just my own hopeless perversion, but I think this paradox has broader implications. Being “dominated by a submissive” is essentially what modern religion is all about – especially Christianity. Jesus undertook the ultimate act of submission. (“Nevertheless, not my will, but thine, be done.”) And it makes perfect sense to me (though I can't explain why) that this is exactly the reason to worship Jesus and to submit to his will. The central symbol of Christianity – which you see almost anywhere you see anything having to do with Christianity – is one which represents that ultimate act of submission. Yet traditionally in the Christian mind it is also a symbol of power. Somehow by representing an act of submission, the cross has the power to dominate vampires, evil spirits, and armed enemies.
Does that make sense? Is it sacrilegious to draw parallels between sex/fetishism and religion?
OK here’s the “but.”. There is one exception. There is one person (can you guess who?) that I would let tie me up. And it isn’t because I trust her more than anyone else. It’s because she’s a goddess, and I a mere mortal, and as such I have no choice but to submit to her will.
She’s a goddess, but she’s also a submissive. And if she had been a domme, she never would have made it to goddess status in my eyes. I have no desire to be dominated by a dominant, but I desire to be dominated by a submissive – in this case, a particular submissive – but submissive women in general excite a certain awe in me, which under the right circumstances would make me want to submit to them.
That’s just my own hopeless perversion, but I think this paradox has broader implications. Being “dominated by a submissive” is essentially what modern religion is all about – especially Christianity. Jesus undertook the ultimate act of submission. (“Nevertheless, not my will, but thine, be done.”) And it makes perfect sense to me (though I can't explain why) that this is exactly the reason to worship Jesus and to submit to his will. The central symbol of Christianity – which you see almost anywhere you see anything having to do with Christianity – is one which represents that ultimate act of submission. Yet traditionally in the Christian mind it is also a symbol of power. Somehow by representing an act of submission, the cross has the power to dominate vampires, evil spirits, and armed enemies.
Does that make sense? Is it sacrilegious to draw parallels between sex/fetishism and religion?