• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Alabama Defies Gay Marriage Ruling

A federal judge on Thursday ordered Mobile County, Ala., to start issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, a ruling that could pave the way for resistant officials across the state to follow suit.

In an eight-page decision, U.S. District Judge Callie V.S. Granade reiterated that the state’s ban on same-sex marriage had been struck down and clarified that *Mobile County’s probate judge, Don Davis, had to adhere to that decision.

The decision, issued around 3:30 p.m. local time, prompted a flurry of activity at Mobile’s marriage-license window, where about 20 gay couples and dozens of well-wishers had gathered in hopes that the shutters — which had been closed all week — would finally open.

About 45 minutes later, they did, prompting a huge round of cheers from the crowd.

“We’re so thrilled,” Sara Sills, 56, who after 23 years with her partner finally got her marriage *license Thursday, said in a phone interview. “We’re on our way across the street to have a drink to celebrate.”

Though Granade’s ruling only directly applies to Mobile County, gay rights groups hope it will provide clarity to probate judges in all 67 Alabama counties, more than half of whom refused to give out marriage licenses to gay couples this week even though same-sex marriage officially became legal in the state on Monday.

Some were defiant, while others were unsure what to do because of a letter issued Sunday by the state’s chief justice, Roy Moore, who ordered probate judges not to issue licenses. The letter prompted confusion and sparked debate over the state’s right to ignore the federal judiciary.

While hundreds of couples were able to get licenses in a few places such as Huntsville and Montgomery, about 200 were turned away elsewhere, gay rights groups said, with the most high-profile confrontation taking place in Mobile.

Harry Satterwhite, Davis’s *at*torney, said the probate judge is “not taking sides in the national debate over same-sex marriage. He is simply trying to follow the law under some very difficult circumstances.”

Critics of same-sex marriage say questions still remain that must be sorted out before it is clear that the probate judges must issue the licenses. On Wednesday, a group of conservative policy organizations in Alabama asked the Alabama Supreme Court to weigh in on the officials’ responsibility.

“We still need a ruling, no matter what it is, from the Alabama Supreme Court,” said Mat Staver, chairman of the Liberty Counsel, a public interest law firm representing the groups as well as more than a half-dozen probate judges.

But gay rights groups say Granade’s ruling should clear up any lingering confusion. The ruling follows a statement earlier in the week from the governor, who said he will not punish any probate judges who issue marriage licenses to gay couples. Officials in about a dozen counties that initially refused to issue licenses had changed course even before Thursday’s ruling, concluding that they had a legal obligation to issue them.

“We’re very happy that our plaintiffs and other same-sex couples in Mobile can now obtain marriage licenses and the protections of marriage, and we hope this will provide sufficient guidance to probate judges in other parts of the state,” said Shannon Minter, legal director for the *National Center for Lesbian Rights, a nonprofit group that helped represent the four plaintiff couples in Thursday’s case.

In an interview with CNN early Thursday, Moore defended his directive that sparked the chaos.

“No judge of the United States or the federal district court has the right to invent the definition of marriage, which is not even contained in the United States Constitution, and that’s the problem,” Moore told host Chris Cuomo. “We have people going in trying to mandate the state of Alabama that the ‘sanctity of marriage’ amendment in our [state] Constitution is wrong, and that’s simply not right to do.”

This just baffles me. I'm not a law expert but from what I learned in my basic law course back in college is that federal law trumps state law. The Supremacy Clause states that the Constitution, and federal statutes and treaties, are the supreme law of the land. If there's a conflict between the federal and state statutes, the federal law preempts the field, meaning it controls the issue. The state law is void.

Roy Moore knows what he's doing. He's already been kicked out of office once back in 2003 for installing a Ten Commandments monument in the Alabama Supreme Court building. He's run for political office before and it's obvious he's seeking political office again. In a deeply red state like Alabama, defying the feds can gain you alot of popularity
 
Roy Moore knows what he's doing. He's already been kicked out of office once back in 2003 for installing a Ten Commandments monument in the Alabama Supreme Court building. He's run for political office before and it's obvious he's seeking political office again. In a deeply red state like Alabama, defying the feds can gain you alot of popularity
Among people who claim to be true American patriots, people who display the confederate flag on their front-yard :facepalm:
 
Among people who claim to be true American patriots, people who display the confederate flag on their front-yard :facepalm:

They should also start putting them in lawns in Wisconsin.

Republican Candidate For Wisconsin Attorney General Says He Would Defend Interracial Marriage Ban (VIDEO)

Not only do Republicans want to ban same-sex marriage, they apparently still can’t accept interracial marriage either, even if the couple is a man and a woman.

In September, the Republican nominee running for attorney general in Wisconsin told the host of a local television program that he would defend an interracial marriage ban if he were in a state with such a law on the books.

During the show “Eye On Oshkosh,” Brad Schimel was asked about same-sex marriage bans in the context of interracial marriage bans in the 1950s. And like most answers given by Republicans on these issues, his response was disappointing to say the least.

In an effort to cover his ass, Schimel released a statement about his comments on Wednesday claiming that “love and the law are colorblind” but again suggested that state attorneys should defend unjust laws in a dig against his Democratic opponent Susan Happ.

Here’s the video via YouTube. The remarks begin at the 28 minute mark.


Love and the law are colorblind, as they should be. Many shameful, racist laws were changed over the course of time in this country by legislators, the courts and the people’s direct votes. But if Susan Happ wants to make up new laws, or change old ones, she’s running for the wrong job.

While it isn’t the 1950s anymore, interracial marriage is still not completely accepted in many southern states. Many states refused to take their bans off the books for decades after the Supreme Court struck down such bans in 1967. For instance, South Carolina only repealed its ban in 1998 and Alabama waited until 2000. That’s less than 20 years ago. In a PPP poll in 2012, 21 percent of Alabama GOP voters said interracial marriage should still be illegal. 29 percent of Republican voters in Mississippi feel the same way. In 2012! So for a candidate running for a top legal post to say that he would defend interracial marriage bans if they were still on the books is outrageous, especially considering that he still intends to fight for Wisconsin’s ban on same-sex marriage despite the Supreme Court allowing lower court rulings that struck down that very ban to stand.

Influenced by the top two bigots in America the Koch Bros.
 
Top